Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Division by Zero's column >>

DIVISION BY ZERO

The beatings will continue until morale improves...
Articles Posted: 183  Links Seeded: 428
Member Since: 6/2006  Last Seen: 5/16/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

EroticaVine Topics: Is There Such a Thing as Bisexuality?

Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:21 PM EDT
health, sex, gay, homosexual, sexuality, straight, bisexual, heterosexual, divbyzero, eroticavine-topics
By Division by Zero

Live Poll

Is there such a thing as bisexuality?

View Results
  • 87961
    Yes
    95%
  • 87962
    No
    0%
  • 87963
    I'm not sure
    5%

VoteTotal Votes: 19

Advertise | AdChoices

A little over a week or so ago I had an interesting conversation with a friend of mine whom I'll call Toni happens to be bisexual. At least Toni says she's bisexual but her partner says that there is absolutely no such thing as bisexuality. She says, quite fervently, that you're either gay or you're straight, with no middle ground whatsoever. I don't think that it is quite as simple as that.

I have always believed that heterosexuality and homosexuality exist along a continuum from one to the other. As such, there are people who are exclusively heterosexual and there are others who are exclusively homosexual. Between the two ends of the continuum there are all kinds of degrees of one or the other. There are some people who are almost exclusively heterosexual and those who are almost exclusively homosexual. There are those who are generally heterosexual but somewhat homosexual and those who are generally homosexual but somewhat heterosexual. There are others who are right down the middle and pretty much split their sexuality 50/50.

Toni says she is primarily a lesbian but she does like to hop on the other side of the fence occasionally to date guys. Her current partner has been exclusively gay for her entire life and has never dated or had sex with a guy. I believe that her partner is one of those who falls on the side of exclusive homosexuality in the same vein that others are exclusively heterosexual. Her partner views it at more of a statement to describe a way of life, that you're either all the way gay or you're not gay. She says that those who claim themselves to be bisexual just aren't comfortable with their sexuality and refuse to choose a side and stick with it. Is this just her personal belief or is it more widely held than I might think? I tend to think that for her partner it is as much a political statement as it is a personal statement. By defining herself as 100% gay she has a "badge" that can exclude those who aren't 100% gay and mark them as being straight. You're either in the tribe or you're not, and if you're in, you have to be all the way in. Those who can't be all the way in aren't worthy of the "badge" and shouldn't enjoy any of the benefits that come with being part of the tribe. I'm sure there are other social groups that would take themselves in the same way, you're either gung ho or you're a pretender and not worthy of being in the group.

One comedian referred to being bisexual as being greedy, not wanting to limit one's choice of partners.

Is there such a thing as bisexuality or is it a cop-out? Can human sexuality only be defined as straight or gay with no in-between? Is it sexuality or politics that makes some say that you can only be one or the other?

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Division by Zero's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: SexVine
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (16)
Division by Zero

So is there such a thing as bisexuality or are they just being insincere or greedy?

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:23 PM EDT
Lilith41

I think there is, but it depends on who you ask. I find that women's sexuality is more fluid VS men's who may not be so. I don't think there is one right answer on this.

Anyway, someone once said that being bisexual is a way to increase your chances for getting a date for Saturday night!

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:49 PM EDT
xDrudge

I'm much more in favour of women being bi than men :)

  • 3 votes
#1.2 - Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:03 PM EDT
kaviaq

I think of sexuality as a spectrum. I think everyone is bisexual, but most of us tend toward same sex or opposite sex relationships. I lean very heavily toward heterosexual and have never had more than a passing crush on a woman (I think I drift further toward bi with age...not sure why).

  • 3 votes
#1.3 - Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:36 PM EDT
Reply
ron c. baker sr.

i AM bi !!! and i am...greedy, hahaha. sex is good...with either sex, so why not have what you want ??? we also have to deal with not being excepted by either gay or straight worlds.

i have been disparaged by gay folks because i DO like women. and, well, the straights just hate your ass (what ass???) regardless !!!

luv,

ron

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Mar 17, 2010 8:48 PM EDT
US Citizen-658112

I've seen at some point various research that has adequately convinced me that psychological sexuality is NOT an all-or-nothing male or female event.

While in most cases it is far enough one way or the other than it is easy to decide which gender is "between the ears", it is clear to me that in a low but persistent number of cases it can get close enough to the "center" that it would be hard to absolutely categorize the psychology as either male or female.

It is therefore reasonable to believe - in my own opinion - that there are a a few humans out there that are genuinely "attracted" to both gender looks (genetically this is called a "phenotype") and not exclusively to what either looks like a female or a male.

I think it might be disconcerting at times for some people to find out that the person they are attracted to is themselves attracted to both genders...as that just screws up "keeping a watch out for interlopers" as everyone, and not just one gender, is a potential competitor.

I don't see why - though - a bisexual person can't be just a faithful to a partner than either a male or female gender person could be. I've never seen any data which suggests that fidelity and/or faithfulness is a function of psychogender.

Most men I know don't really care if they are "with" a female that has lesbian interests too, just so they don't "fall in love" with their lesbian partner and leave them for the "other woman". Really, the female capacity for sexual pleasure is so much greater than the males is (at one time...) that if the female has 10 or 15 orgasms outside of heterosexual intercourse, it's almost a relief as she is at that time just as tuckered out as the male is, and everyone is satiated and happy. Sexual aid, lesbian partner, who cares...just so the marital bond remains intact. At least some people feel like this...as there are many relationships with bisexual partners on one side that are "working".

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:11 PM EDT
maddad

if there isn't i have seen some pretty good acting.....oh for the younger days....bad maddad

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:13 PM EDT
chelli

I definitely think that bisexuality is real. I believe that most people choose not to act on it, but it is still there in fantasy land. Most people try to live up to the norms in society, unless they are way gay or way straight. I would wager that, just like politics, there are about 1/3 of the people that fall somewhere in the middle--even though they would never admit it--until they meet the right person to bring them to it.

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Mar 18, 2010 12:12 AM EDT
daxy1979

I'm bi.. so here's my take on it.

Yes it exists.. if it doesn't I"m in trouble! LOL However, I think some people only do it as a fad. Unfortunately like ron c. baker sr. says, you do tend to get a lot of hatred from both sides. Straights think you're just "experimenting" and the gay/lesbian side thinks you're just "pretending". Not all mind you, but there are a lot of them out there on both sides that feel this way. Personally I'm one of the 50/50 types. I don't really have a preference. I am however married to a man. I'm with him and no one else.. being with another, even another female would be cheating unless maybe we were both with her cheating.. then I"m hoping it cancels out! LOL

  • 3 votes
Reply#6 - Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:53 AM EDT
K-joy

I tend to think that bisexuality is the ability to remain open minded about finding a good mate. They are not limited by gender or even sexuality when it comes to compatibility. There is something to be said for that. Perhaps the bisexual person has a greater capacity to love and find connections?

I will admit to thinking at one time that bisexuals were simply confused or over sexed. In my head it did not make sense to like both sexes in the same way.

  • 3 votes
Reply#7 - Thu Mar 18, 2010 1:24 PM EDT
sunnybunny1269

I would define bisexuality as enjoying sex with either men or women. How can you say that doesn't exists? Do you mean something else?

  • 4 votes
Reply#8 - Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:21 PM EDT
shepherd0886

Well, here is my personal opinion. Sexuality is sexuality. It really has nothing to do with gender but rather the feelings, sensations, and the ulitumate climax (orgasm). Pre-pubescent children, when left to their own devices and not closely supervised by an adult who brings their own notions about sexuality to bear, often fondle and play with each other with little or no inhibitions or gender specific selection. However the on-set of puberty brings about the typical changes in the body and the hormonal balance which then causes children to question their sexuality as it relates to gender. That is when the social norm of heterosexuality becomes imprinted on them. Now, that being said, there is enough research that indicates that some are born with a certain pre-determination toward same sex preference. However the majority of us are simply socially conditioned to be heterosexual and gradually give up the open attitudes that we had as children.

Those born with a homosexual predilection are then repressed because of the social pressures while the rest of us are conditioned to be exclusively heterosexual. Through the reproductive years (puberty until about 45 or 50 years of age) such social conditioning remains pretty much set in our minds. However in later years, post reproductive, these attitudes begin to relax a bit and we find many who then willingly experiment much as they did when they were pre-pubescent. Though the social pressures still exist, the tendency in older people is to simply care less what others may think about their sexual choices. This is also about the time that the desire for some sexual diversity comes into play. People in their 40s and 50s tend to be more inclined to engage in open relationships, participate in mate swapping activities, and actively participate in swing clubs. In a sense, they revert to the innocence of their childhood and the goal is simply personal enjoyment and satisfaction.

Another factor is simply availability. Take men in prison for example. They may engage in all manner of homosexual activities but once released back into the general population they typically revert to heterosexual behavior. The same can be said of people who live in very remote and secluded places. They have been known to even engage in beastiality simply as a diversion from typical masturbatory practices. As I said in the beginning, sexuality is sexuality. The ultimate goal of sex is pleasure and the gratification of the orgasm.

Both men and women have utilized 'substitues' for sexual partners since the dawn of recorded history. The difference comes when one is chosing a mate for reproductive purposes. This, obviously, requires a standard heterosexual union in order to unite the male sperm with the female egg. Therefore, normal heterosexuals and even some who are genetically homosexuals will select a mate of the appropriate gender for that purpose. Since Mother Nature has essentially blurred our sexual identities from birth, it is only when social values and mores are inflicted upon us that we must conform or be ostracized by the rest in our social group. Therefore, we are all essentially bi-sexual unless we have the genetic markers for definite homosexuality.

Now, the question of why society seems more accepting of female/female relationships I think stems from the fact that women are regarded more as nurturers and care givers as well as the birth givers in our world. They are consistantly more affectionate in every way with each other as well as with select males of our species. It is only when they exclude the male members and become exclusively lesbian that society generally spurns them.

Regarding the question of the existence of bi-sexuality I tend to largely agree with Division by Zero. Yes it does exist but I go one step further and say that it exists in us all except for those who are predisposed to exclusive homosexuality by genetics. The males in our world generally have the most difficult time accepting this concept because, here again, the males view sexual activity as an act of dominance. Thus in a male/male relationship one or the other must play the submissive roll and this again is something that we are conditioned against from childhood. Women, on the other hand, are conditioned to be submissive to a selected male for the purpose of procreation.

Had the concepts of the sexual revolution of the 70s been completely successful and become universally accepted in our society, the question of who has sex with who would be about as relevant as whether you prefer Gucci or Prada. If you like it and it feels good wear it, or if you like em and they feel good do em. Sex is ultimately a gift from Mother Nature to insure the preservation of our species. The fact that our social constraints have villified and demonized its practice for any other purpose is simply ludicrous and generally unhealthy for us both physically and emotionally. But, as I said, that is just my opinion along with a few pretty smart scientists and psychologists.

  • 2 votes
Reply#9 - Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:39 PM EDT
shepherd0886

Hey Div I have issued a 'friend request' to you. Don't know if you have just missed it or are perhaps ignoring me. LOL I would understand either way because I can be a bit weird sometimes. HEH HEH HEH HEH However in following some of your posts and comments we seem to share some similar attitudes. Would love to have ya as a friend.

Thanks for reinstating me as a member on EroticaVine also. I enjoy posting there but find it interesting that there is so little interest in such material. dkaz made an interesting point. She said that after visiting other sites and posts and making various comments, she simply isn't in the mood for erotica. Hmmmm. Odd that we should allow ourselves to become so emotionally upset by other issues that we cannot take a few minutes for some personal pleasure. For me, that is sort of a personal refuge from the unpleasantness of the day. LOL

Ah well, as I often say, we create many of our own monsters in life. Have a great day my friend and I'll see ya around on the Vine.

  • 1 vote
Reply#10 - Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:23 PM EDT
Division by Zero

Friend request accepted. I'm on the road this week working long days (8am-7pm) so I haven't been able to sustain my usual Newsvine activity level. No slight intended, I've just been busy.

  • 1 vote
#10.1 - Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:53 PM EDT
shepherd0886

Understand. Been there - done that - TGIRN (thank God I'm retired now) LOL Just spend my days doin' what I wanna, fanticizin' about what I oughta, checkin' out da puta, and hopin' I don't get caughta. :=)) Actually though for the right 'chica' I wouldn't mind gettin' caught. HEH HEH HEH HEH.

    #10.2 - Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:17 PM EDT
    Reply
    Scott-317099

    As a bi man, I suspect bisexuality exists. I also believe that people's psycho-sexuality changes with age, opportunity, and wisdom. Things that were horribly taboo at 20 are now merely titillating at 42. Experience, confidence, and being comfortable with oneself makes things look different.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#11 - Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:36 AM EDT
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com